Exact Universe by Swami Ram

RELATIVITY OF REALITY

Theoretical physics has been hopelessly stalled for more than 50 years. The standard model of physics has been increasingly falsified by erroneously ad hoc constants, and no one knows why they were placed there. When a physicist was stuck for answers, all he or she had to do was invent a “constant” that would fall right into their values which would fail to give the desired result without adding the constant to it. This is not real, it is like saying “I created this invention but it will only work if you accept it.” Another analogy could be when companies promote their cereals saying that it must be eaten with milk, but that’s not true. Nevertheless, the combination was created to increase sales of both items.

Quantum and General Relativity Theory remains utterly incompatible. Cosmologists haven’t the faintest idea what caused the Big Bang or even if it ever existed. Over 30 years of String Theory has not even achieved any scientific recognition. Both the old and the new physics have not really answered many of the major questions in life, such as:

Why are we here?

Who are we in the universe?

Where are we going?

What is our purpose in the universe?

This is the very reason for this catastrophic and intractable mess. Physicists and theorists are looking at the tree and not the seed. Instead of realizing that the tree is in the seed, they are looking at the tree with admiration and awe. They deduced the benefits of the tree, they admire its greenery and shadiness, and they eat its fruits, yet fail to realize that all of these came from a seed which can be carried in the palm of your hand. The short-sighted theorists would take the tree, put it in a tractor trailer, take it to another location, and plant it so that he can benefit from it. The smart physicist would instead carry the seed (as many as he wants) and plant it in the new location where he can benefit from it.

In other words, the question is not who “we” are”, the question is who am “I?” Instead of asking what “our” purpose is, the question should be what is “my” purpose? Furthermore, the question of why are “we” here should really be why am “I” here, where did “I” come from and so on.

Without the observer in an experiment answering the questions about his own existence, how would he be able to answer questions about his surrounding universe, let alone your existence? Without looking at the seed that contained the whole tree, how can he answer the questions about the origin of the tree and all its fruits?

If the observer is not able to answer these very important questions about his existence, he will never be able to analyze the existence of the universe. By coming across answers about his own existence, he will first assess his own coordinate position in the universe which in turn will help him discover “why” in why he is there and the “how” in how he fits into the universe’s coordinates. It is only then that the answers to the creation of the universe will unfold and reveal themselves.

Without the “why” of his self, mathematical symmetries becomes numerological idiosyncrasies that are randomly applied to fit an illusionary conclusion that is not scientifically oriented at all. No telescope or particle accelerator, regardless of its size, is going to tell us “why” we exist and “why” the universe is the way it is unless the “I” question of the experimental observer is answered or solved.

When this question remains unanswered there is no understanding of the observer, the universe, or the experiment, there is only illusion. When there is no understanding of any of these, then there is no progress.